Article

Although AI in art can be a powerful tool for creating new forms of art that may not have been possible with traditional techniques, it is important to note that the use of AI in art also raises important questions about authorship and creativity. Some artists use AI as a part of the artistic process, whereas others have opted to give control over to the machine entirely. In these latter cases, ethical questions of authorship arise.

Rather than succinct answers, however, the daily developments of AI have uncovered more questions and challenges to consider. For instance, who should be credited as the creator of AI-generated art? The artist who programmed the algorithm, the machine, or the AI system itself? This raises questions about intellectual property rights and the value of originality and creativity. Additionally, should artists be transparent with their use of AI-generated images? Just as writers cite their sources, should we treat AI in a similar fashion as the work may not be considered the artist’s own original output? Should we even identify AI-generated art as original or is it just a sophisticated imitation of other artists’ works?

Especially important to bear in mind is the impact of inherent bias in AI technologies. Nuance and sensitivity are not necessarily captured in data sets which can result in culturally insensitive and exclusionary works. AI algorithms and systems can perpetuate biases and stereotypes if they are not carefully designed and trained. This can result in art that reinforces harmful or discriminatory attitudes and representations.

source

• Tags
• #Artificial intelligence
• #Art
• #Artists
• #algorithm